Difference Between Francis and Kaplan Turbine
Published: 17 Nov 2025
Among all types of turbines, the Francis and Kaplan turbines are among the most common and effective used in hydroelectric plants.
Both belong to the reaction turbine family, meaning they use both pressure and velocity energy of water. However, they differ in design, working principle, and the type of water flow they handle. Understanding the difference between Francis and Kaplan turbines helps engineers and students choose the right turbine for a specific site.
Difference Between Francis and Kaplan Turbine
The Francis turbine and Kaplan turbine may serve the same purpose, but they work best under different conditions. Here’s how they differ from each other:
| Francis Turbine | Kaplan Turbine | |
| Type of Turbine | It is a mixed-flow reaction turbine. Water enters the runner radially and exits axially. | It is an axial-flow reaction turbine where water flows parallel to the turbine shaft. |
| Water Head | Works best for medium head conditions, usually between 60 and 250 meters. | Designed for low head conditions, generally below 30 meters. |
| Flow Rate | Needs a medium discharge of water for proper operation. | Handles high discharge or large flow efficiently. |
| Runner Blades | The blades of the runner stay fixed and do not move. | The runner blades are adjustable, helping it maintain efficiency at different flow rates. |
| Number of Blades | Usually has 16 to 24 blades. | Has fewer blades, usually 3 to 8. |
| Direction of Water Flow | Water flows radially inward and then axially downward. | Water flows axially through the runner. |
| Specific Speed | Has a specific speed range of 50 to 260. | Has a higher specific speed, ranging from 260 to 850. |
| Energy Loss and Efficiency | Experiences more energy loss because of its many blades. Its efficiency is slightly lower. | Has less frictional loss due to fewer blades and offers up to 90% efficiency. |
| Shaft Orientation | The shaft can be installed horizontally or vertically. | The shaft is always vertical due to its axial flow design. |
| Compactness and Speed | Larger in size and runs at a lower speed for the same head and output. | More compact and runs at a higher speed for a given head. |
| Applications | Used in medium-head hydroelectric plants and dam-based projects. | Suitable for low-head power plants, irrigation systems, and run-of-the-river setups. |
Conclusion
Both the Francis turbine and the Kaplan turbine are vital for generating hydroelectric power efficiently. The Francis turbine is perfect for medium head and medium flow conditions, offering steady performance and durability. Meanwhile, the Kaplan turbine is designed for low head and high flow areas, providing flexibility and higher efficiency with adjustable blades.
- Be Respectful
- Stay Relevant
- Stay Positive
- True Feedback
- Encourage Discussion
- Avoid Spamming
- No Fake News
- Don't Copy-Paste
- No Personal Attacks
- Be Respectful
- Stay Relevant
- Stay Positive
- True Feedback
- Encourage Discussion
- Avoid Spamming
- No Fake News
- Don't Copy-Paste
- No Personal Attacks